Tuesday, May 18, 2010

But have you ever been to Omaha?

I have become a huge fan of Dan Carlin's Hardcore History. It is a boon companion when I am out on a run or ride, especially because it often lasts longer than most other podcasts. Where they may peter out at 50 minutes, Hardcore History can sometimes last over an hour and a half. This fits my leisurely (read: slow) riding and running pace perfectly.

As I'm crossing over the Bob Kerrey Pedestrian Bridge, Carlin may be giving an account of Hannibal's journey over the Alps. Should I be toiling up Omaha's many hills, he may be describing the atrocity of Hitler's siege of Stalingrad or Stalin's own draconian orders to kill his own soldiers who flee or retreat.

Me: "Maybe this hill's not so bad, after all?"

A Carthaginian soldier's ordeal or the Russian civilian's horror somehow takes the edge off going another mile or trying to speed up a little.

Most recently Carlin was considering the relative toughness of societies and generations within societies. He asked: "All things being equal, would our generation win a war against American's of our grandparents' generation?" (my paraphrase)

As it happens, Carlin had already caused me to wonder at my own generation's ease and luxury, compared to that of generations past. As in, "I'm kind of a wimp, huh? And I'm raising some wimpy kids, too." It's not intentional, but there's just not that much that many of us need to do that entails that much physical toil. Consider how painful it is to endure the inconvenience of a remote control with dead batteries. Or having to charge our iPhones each night. Will these Dark Ages ever end?

During the most recent podcast, "Show 33 - (BLITZ) Old School Toughness," he said described the way Genghis Khan's descendants would keep the Mongol troops in fighting form by rotating them out of the urbane Chinese cities they occupied and sending them back to the wind-swept, desolate steppes from which they came:

It'd be like if you soldiers stationed in New York, Chicago, Los Angeles or New Orleans, and then you have to rotate them out to Omaha, Iowa City, Ames, Butte . . . places where you could get a good night's sleep. [~53:00]
As he was making this modern analogy, I had been expecting him to say that troops might be sent out to Death Valley or maybe Montana (Butte, even?). Instead, he said, "Omaha," and I laughed out loud when puffing away on my ride back from Council Bluffs along the Wabash Trace Trail.

In a way, of course, he's right. You can get a good night's sleep in Omaha. It's harder in Chicago, especially if you live close to the El or a garage out of which the street cleaning trucks start emerging at ungodly hours in the morning, as I have had the privilege to experience.

On that note, I would say that life is tougher in the biggest cities than in mid-sized cites. In our largest cities, people make more money, but also have higher living expenses. They spend more time in traffic. They deal with more pollution. They are generally more stressed.

Comparatively, Omaha is a great place to live. Commute times are short (with a median of 17 minutes). The air is fresh and people are friendly. If anything, things are maybe a bit too easy.

Still, when you have more free time, as one does in Omaha, you can fill it with whatever you choose that is available, whether that's more TV (ugh), a concert (cool), or a morning bike ride with friends. I've met more people in Omaha who are involved in their community and encourage others to join them than I have ever even heard of in other cities. People who visit or study the city, usually say the same.

Does this make us very tough? Probably not. As Carlin says in the podcast, we may be living in the decline of the current American empire, but that's generally when the most fun is had, as he notes. I just wanted Carlin to know that some of that fun can be had in Omaha, too.

Tuesday, May 11, 2010

Craigslist MacBook Pro Scam (Strikes Again)

I once read a book about writing copy which described greed as one of the motivators to consider when writing ads.

I recalled this when looking for a computer for my wife. I found on Craigslist a MacBook Pro for $500. After inquiring about it, I received a few messages from Laura (laura.hilton31@hotmail.com), who had recently moved to Manchester UK, even though the listing came up here in Omaha. Here's what she said:

This is Laura again from Manchester, United Kingdom regarding the 15" Unibody MacBook Pro. Did you receive my earlier email?
I just wanted to make sure you have all the specs for the laptop, the Apple 15.4" Unibody MacBook Pro Laptop for $500.
The complete specs are below.2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo Processor, 4.0 GB 1066 MHz DDR3 SDRAM Memory, NVIDIA GeForce 9400M and NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT Graphics Processors with 512MB of GDDR3 Memory, 500GB SATA 5400 RPM Hard Drive, iSight camera. Also included is the Lithium-Polymer Battery and also the Apple Remote and Case.
Let me know if you like it.

Laura


She also sent a third message with pictures. First of all, I've never bought anything from Craigslist from someone at whose house I couldn't pick up the item and pay for it. Second, this was an incredibly good deal (tapping into my greed, I'm sure).

So I did a quick search on the Google. And guess what? It's a scam. Thanks Jacob Burke and Kelly T Adams. While a few of the details were different, enough were the same for there to be no doubt in my mind that I'd been duped. At least it was before I sent any money away, right?

Next time, I'll consider that copy writing book before I even inquire.

Check out the pics. This looks totally legit:



Thursday, January 07, 2010

Very Snowy Omaha

I walked to the Creighton University library and realized that I was looking at more snow than I'd ever seen in my life.

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Eduweb 2009 Pencasts

I was at eduWEB 2009 conference in Chicago (July 20 - 22, 2009) and took some notes from the sessions I attended on my Livescribe Pulse Smartpen. Not to be too much of a shill, but I find it much easier to take memorable notes when writing on paper, drawing arrows and doodles, boxing things and such. I've never been able to quickly do the same on a laptop.

Below, you will find my handwritten notes with audio of the session. I apologize if the audio is hard to hear. I tried to get close in most sessions or at least in a place where I could hear the speaker.

eduWEB brought together other folks who work on the interwebs for colleges and universities, primarily. We tend to be very geeky, I suppose. I fit right in.

Sessions from Monday, July 20, 2009


Bob Johnson: "Student Recruitment in the Online World: Communicating from First Web Search to Final Enrollment" (part 1)






Bob Johnson: "Student Recruitment in the Online World: Communicating from First Web Search to Final Enrollment" (part 2)



Dimitri Glazkov: "The Next Big Thing" (Opening Keynote)



Karlyn Morissette: "The Five Commandments of Email Marketing"



Stewart Foss: "Higher Style for Higher-Ed Web Design"



Sessions from Tuesday, July 21, 2009


Sarah Stanek: "The Role of Writers"



Tom Williams: "User Generated Content: Tapping Into the Power"



Annette Levitt: "Facebook -- a case study of building virtual relationships"



Kyle James: "SEO Best Practices: The Low Hanging Fruit for Immediate Results"



Robin Smail and Nikki Massaro Kauffman: "Twitter Me This?"



Brad Ward: "I Can Do That with Google!"



Sessions from Wednesday, July 22, 2009


Brian Niles: "Biz.edu: Crazy Times Call for Crazy Ideas" (Closing Keynote)



Christopher Schmitt: "Javascript for People Who Don't Code"



Nikki Chun & Adrienne Bartlett: "Practical Uses of Social Media for Recruitment Marketing"


Wednesday, October 15, 2008

The debates are over and the winner is . . .

America. Seriously, while I don't think we've really delved all that deep into their policies, given the tendency of both candidates to hammer home key talking points on taxes, the environment, the war, health care and the economy.

All told, though, we have an idea about these two guys that we wouldn't have otherwise had. Most of us don't get to a political rally. Most of us only hear from these fellows in their ads and that usually only at the end "I'm [John McCain/Barack Obama] and I approve this message." Even as mediated an experience as this was (as we are not in the room with these guys, we have to rely on the camera angles and cuts, the lighting and the quality of the sound system to help us understand what is happening), we still saw more than we may otherwise ever see. This is certainly true of the loser of Nov. 4. At what other time are you going to see over 2 hours of one of these guys again (unless you are a C-SPAN junkie)?

We know that John McCain seems like an angry guy. "Seems" is operative, though, as we must recall Al Gore's robot impersonation from 2000. John McCain may be a barrel of laughs, but you wouldn't know it from these debates.

Conversely, Barack Obama seems like a pretty chill guy, able to take whatever someone's dishing out without getting too rattled. Is he overly smart? Some people might feel that. Keep in mind, "smart" people aren't always right, after all. (Socrates made mincemeat out of such as these in the agora back in Athens, right?)

We also saw that McCain probably is a fighter. Heck, he was fighting while he was sitting at the table next to Obama. That can be a crucial quality in a scrap.

Obama is a diplomat, always trying to see how he can bring the two sides together.

While part of me loves the fighter (who doesn't like a good scuffle every now and then), the adult in me (the one with three kids who fight too much anyway and a lovely wife with whom keeping the best of relations is always to be desired) appreciates the diplomat. At this point in our history, too, I'd have to say that it is the diplomat who I belive is most direly needed to lead us out of this, a guy who can bring all the sides to the table and get them talking.

I don't mind McCain, really (Palin, on the other hand . . . .), but Obama is what we need. I think his brand of politics, his brand of transcendence (compared to McCain's) couldn't come too soon. And I think we saw why over the past 3 debates.

Blessed are the peacemakers, after all . . .

Obama's closing

These last 8 years have sucked. Really sucked. And failed.

We need change. Fundamental change.

It’s a fundamental thing, basically.

Tax cuts for the middle class.
Lifting wages, middle class.

All of us need to come together, spirit of sacrifice and responsibility.

McCain's closing

Healthy discussion.

America needs a new direction.

I’ll take on any party. [Give me a party and I’ll take it on.]

Yes, it’s no doubt that he’s a deficit hawk. It’s true.

Do you trust us?

I spent my life serving.

on Education

We spend the most but are falling behind. What should we do?

Obama: This is about our economic future.

We’ve got to get education right: reform and more money.

College is no longer affordable. (Preach it, brother!) $4,000 tuition credit in exchange for service. That is kind of cool. Parents need to step up.

McCain: it’s the civil rights issue of the 21st cent. What is the advantage of sending to a failed school? We need to spank the bad teachers. Charter schools. Don’t throw money at the problem.  Reward good teachers.

We must improve education. A realistic repayment schedule.

Schieffer: Fed gov’t’s role?

Obama: Fed gov’t needs to help local schools. Money has been left behind in No Child Left Behind. I doubled charter schools in Illinois.

McCain: vouchers are the best things since sliced bread, no matter what you say. It’s not about spending money.  Sarah Palin knows about autism [that’s why she left her kids to go back to work after three days.]

on Justices

McCain: it doesn’t matter what they think, so long as they adhere to the constitution (but that’s the rub isn’t it). No litmus test, though.

Obama: No litmus test. Justices are some of the biggest decisions we make. Roe v Wade was right. Abortion is a moral issue, about which we can disagree. Women need to be able to make that decision. States shouldn’t be able to invade rights of privacy.

Pay discrimination, now. Courts need to stand up when nobody else will.

McCain: we need to change the culture. Obama voted against something that was beautiful and good. Obama’s extreme. Loves killing babies. If only there were more for him to kill, he’d be all over that.

Obama: If it sounds incredible, it’s because it’s false. I believe in a ban on late-term abortions, but the right won’t allow any exceptions in case of women’s life. There’s common ground, right, on preventing unintended pregnancies, allowing single mother’s keep their babies safely. It’s always tragic.

McCain: health of the mother means ANYTHING. We adopted children, but still have to protect the unborn.

Joe the plumber wins tonight!


McCain on Joe the Plumber

He loves that plumber.

He’s raising the specter of socialized health care.

What’s gold-plated insurance? Where can I find this? What does that even mean?

Choosing your future.

Fundamental differences: Obama wants gov’t to control your life. I’m for getting rid of the government.

Now, it’s democrats in charge of Congress, yikes.

Obama on health

It’s only the large businesses that pay for health care or are required to provide health care.

[Obama is letting McCain call the shots, responding to his talking points. I’m not sure if this benefits Obama or not. Perhaps it shows that he’s willing to get along.]

McCain is taxing benefits. Insurers are restricted by state law, but that would go away.

McCain on health care

Costs are escalating, inflicting pain. We need to put health records online.  Obesity. We need nutrition programs. Practice wellness.

Joe the plumber is McCain’s buddy, now. Really?  Joe doesn’t want to pay a fine.
Who does?

Obama: Health insurance

[Please, please, please let’s get lower cost health insurance. Everyone benefits.]

Is Obama is going spend some more money?

McCain on Obama

He sure loves him some terrorists—like Chavez. He just can’t get enough.

McCain: Obama is the new Hoover, who knew?

Obama: I do understand Columbia

Labor leaders are dying. Workers should be able to organize. The Peruvian trade agreement was well structured. Need to understand the benefits and detriments of trade agreements.

Auto industry: we need to do loan guarantees with the agreement that they start innovating. We can create new jobs, retooling plants.

Green should be creating more “green.”

McCain on free trade

Obama opposes free trade. Not me.

Obama doesn’t travel enough, apparently.

Obama on energy

High fuel-efficient car should be built here. Yes.

NAFTA: any trade is  a good trade agreement, according to Bush and McCain, says Obama.

Obama is an EXTREME environmentalist?!